Electoral systems are the central pillar of every constitutional design. To
understand their effect on party systems, we need to consider the issue of territory.
Electoral system studies have attempted to explain the format of party systems in
post-communist democracies. Usually, proportional representation allows for large
multi-party systems and single-seat district elections leading to two-party competition,
yet studies on post-communist Europe seem to reveal something different. Are
post-communist democracies so chaotic that they surpass the limits of the electoral system
school?
This study considers the importance of territory: it matters not only how many votes
parties get, but also where they get them. The book extends research on the territorial
structure of party systems (party nationalization) to 20 post-communist democracies.
It explains party nationalization as a consequence of ethnically oriented
politics, and, by extending common models of electoral systems, it shows how party
nationalization can increase our understanding of electoral systems.
DANIEL BOCHSLER is a Research Fellow at the Central European
University, Hungary. He studies comparative politics, with a particular emphasis on the
nationalization of party systems and on electoral systems. His work has been published in
Electoral Studies, Public Choice, Regional and Federal Studies, and the Swiss Political
Science Review.
Table of Contents
Introduction: Electoral Systems and Party Systems in the New European
Democracies
The Puzzle of Electoral Systems Impact in Post-communist Democracies
How to Measure Party Nationalization
Explaining the Nationalization of Party Systems in Central and Eastern Europe
How Party Systems Develop in Mixed Electoral Systems
Counting Votes and Places: The Joint Effect of Electoral Rules and Territory
Conclusion: An Institutional Model to Predict the Number of Parties in
Central and Eastern Europe
232 pages, Hardcover