Value Based Management
The Financial Management
Association in conjunction with the Harvard Business School Press cosponsors the
publication of the Survey and Synthesis Series in an effort to bridge the gap between
financial research and the practice of finance. The subject of this book is value based
management (VBM), which is the generic term for a set of management tools used to
facilitate managing a firm's operations in a way that enhances shareholder value. VBM is a
relatively recent innovation in financial practice that has only recently begun affecting
financial research. The purpose of this book is to provide a survey of the tools and
practices of VBM in a way that will be useful to academics and business practitioners
alike.
In a sense VBM is itself a
synthesis of multiple business disciplines and subjects. From finance VBM has adopted the
goal of shareholder value creation along with the acceptance of the discounted cash flow
valuation paradigm. From business strategy VBM has accepted the notion that value creation
is a result of investing in market niches or opportunities where the firm has some
comparative advantage over current and potential competitors. From accounting VBM has
adopted the basic structure of the firm's accounting statements and modified them for its
own purposes. And finally, from organizational behavior VBM has adopted the notion that
"what you measure and reward gets done." Thus, the VBM system constitutes a
measurement and reward system designed to encourage employees to focus their activities on
the creation of shareholder value.
The development of VBM
actually hinges upon some fundamental principles that have long been a part of the world
of academic finance. First, VBM adopts as a given that value creation depends on
discounted cash flow valuation concepts. Second, VBM is built upon the belief that a
firm's actions are of great interest to the investing public. Thus, the manager should
assume the perspective of the firm's investors when deciding how best to run the business.
Business practice has evolved
along two avenues. Capital budgeting practice adopted the notion of discounted future cash
flow valuation. However, performance evaluation of ongoing operations for most firms
continues to be based on annual accounting measures such as earnings and earnings growth.
The inconsistency between these performance measures and shareholder value creation
has long been recognized, but applying forward-looking valuation approaches presents some
very difficult problems. VBM systems purport to resolve these problems and have gained
widespread following, for instance, a special issue of Fortune magazine every year ranks
the greatest U.S. wealth creators, and the Wall Street Journal provides rankings based on
total shareholder returns.
Three principal methods are
being used in value based management, corresponding for the most part to the particular
managerial consulting firm that serves as its proponent:
1. The free cash flow method
as proposed in one form or another by such firms as McKinsey & Co. and LEK/Alcar
2. The economic value
added/market value added (EVA/MVA) method espoused by Stern Stewart & Co.
3. The cash flow return on
investment (CFROI) approach used by the Boston Consulting Group and HOLT Value Associates
Although frequently promoted
as new developments, all three of these techniques rely on the basic theory that underlies
the use of traditional discounted cash flow methods for evaluating new investment
opportunities. This is not to say that VBM does not bring something new and needed to the
table. VBM is a way to assess the success or failure of ongoing operations; that is, it
provides management with a method for evaluating the performance of the firm's existing
assets or assets-in-place, using the same standard that is used to evaluate new asset
acquisitions (i.e., the anticipated contribution to share value). This distinction is
important because up to 40 percent of a firm's assets are not subjected to any discounted
cash flow evaluation before being acquired. Consequently, managers of these assets have
never been held accountable in terms of value creation or lack of it. In addition, VBM
provides a structure for connecting performance with compensation- a matter of primary
importance if we want managers to have the incentive to act in the shareholders' interest.
The growing interest in VBM
can be largely attributed to the rising prominence of shareholder interests in the
management and control of U.S. corporations. This increasing concern for shareholder
interests can be directly traced to the dramatic rise in institutional share holdings of
U.S. corporations over the last two decades....
246pages