Panic Rules
FOREWORD
by Jeremy Brecher
A funny thing happened on the
way to the New Millennium: the Old Millennium crashed. According to economist Paul
Krugman, "Never in the course of economic events not even in the early years of the
Depression has so large a part of the world economy experienced so devastating a fall from
grace."
If you leaf back through the
writings of mainstream economists and media pundits over the past decade, you will
discover that such a global economic crisis couldn't happen, that it wasn't happening,
that it wasn't as bad as people said, that it probably was a good thing in the long run,
and that, anyway, it's over. If you want to escape this miasma of denial, read Robin
Hahnel' s Panic Rules!
In contrast to all the
ballyhoo celebrating the "new global economy," Hahnel shows that for most
people, globalization wasn't so cool even before this Pre-Millennial Meltdown. From 1980
to 1995, per capita GDP (Gross Domestic Product) grew less than 1 percent per year
worldwide with most of the gains going to the already rich. For every NIC (Newly
Industrializing Country), there were ten of what Hahnel ironically dubs "FEBs"
countries Falling Evermore Behind. And for everyone growing wealthy on rising stock
prices, profits, and high salaries, there were ten victims of downsizing and declining
real wages.
Hahnel, himself an economist,
challenges the economic dogma that unregulated markets, free trade, and globalization
necessarily improve global economic efficiency, let alone that they must lead to benefits
for all. Since the market doesn't charge firms for the environmental and social damage
they do, unregulated markets give them an incentive to dump their wastes as cheaply as
they can and to drive small fanners off the land, even if they then have to live in
squalor in already bursting cities. Conversely, the market doesn't give individual firms
an incentive to invest in education or health care, even if these are far more
"efficient" means of creating well-being for society as a whole than producing
sports utility vehicles.
Hahnel presents a theoretical
case that, under free-trade conditions, even if there are "efficiency gains"
from trade as each country specializes in what it does best, the lion's share of any gains
from trade are likely to go to the wealthier trading partners, thereby aggravating global
inequality. And in reality, this is just what has been happening in the era of
globalization. A comparison of 56 countries shows that the spread in GDP per capita
between the richest and poorest increased from 40:1 to 72:1 between 1973 and 1992. Just in
the past four years, the world's 200 richest people have doubled their wealth, while the
number of people living in absolute poverty has increased by 200 million
124 pages