Social justice: an ideal, forever beyond our grasp; or one of many practical
possibilities? More than a matter of intellectual discourse, the idea of justice plays a
real role in how—and how well—people live. And in this book the distinguished scholar
Amartya Sen offers a powerful critique of the theory of social justice that, in its grip
on social and political thinking, has long left practical realities far behind.
The transcendental theory of justice, the subject of Sen’s analysis, flourished in the
Enlightenment and has proponents among some of the most distinguished philosophers of our
day; it is concerned with identifying perfectly just social arrangements, defining the
nature of the perfectly just society. The approach Sen favors, on the other hand, focuses
on the comparative judgments of what is “more” or “less” just, and on the
comparative merits of the different societies that actually emerge from certain
institutions and social interactions.
At the heart of Sen’s argument is a respect for reasoned differences in our
understanding of what a “just society” really is. People of different persuasions—for
example, utilitarians, economic egalitarians, labor right theorists, no-nonsense
libertarians—might each reasonably see a clear and straightforward resolution to
questions of justice; and yet, these clear and straightforward resolutions would be
completely different. In light of this, Sen argues for a comparative perspective on
justice that can guide us in the choice between alternatives that we inevitably face.
Library Journal
Nobel Prize winner in economics, Sen (Development as Freedom) is also an eminent
philosopher. Here, he uses his skill in both disciplines to criticize prevailing theories
of justice and to propose a replacement. John Rawls's A Theory of Justice (1971) is the
most famous example of what Sen calls a transcendental theory, describing an ideal state
of affairs. This does not tell us what to do in our imperfect world; for that, he argues,
a comparative theory is needed, ranking various possible outcomes. To consider only wealth
or add an estimate of happiness is inadequate. In addition, the capabilities of people to
achieve good lives need to be assessed. Following Rawls, Sen stresses public reason, a
type of democratic deliberation that emphasizes reasonable agreements among people with
different conceptions of the good. Throughout the book, Sen's wide historical knowledge is
put to good use. VERDICT This is an essential book; it sums up and extends the
contributions of one of the world's leading thinkers about justice.—David Gordon,
Bowling Green State Univ., OH
Amartya Sen, winner of the 1998 Nobel Prize in Economics, is Lamont
University Professor, Harvard University.
496 pages, Hardcover